Friday, July 4, 2008

Noam Chomsky fails 911 Litmus Test Again

http://images.jupiterimages.com/common/detail/09/51/23365109.jpgThat there's something strange, mysterious, contradictory, absurd, about his refusal to see that anybody other than Lee Harvey Oswald might have killed JFK, his refusal to become involved in looking into, whatsoever, the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy and Malcolm X, and then, of course, although a lot of people cut him slack and were in effect in denial about Chomsky on those decapitations of the Left... but 9/11 came along, it's a Litmus test, I swear it's a Litmus test for every individual, every organization... where do they stand on 9/11?

And of course he just proceeded to fail the 9/11 Litmus test entirely. And I think this has caused a lot of people to just say, to themselves, "There's gotta be something really wrong with Chomsky." And apparently I've articulated it in this 15,000-word chapter.

And I do believe, that he is, an "agent of disinformation". Now, I don't say "disinformation agent", which would imply that he is on the payroll of the CIA, which is something that I cannot prove, and I do not necessarily believe. But he certainly is an "agent of disinformation". And there are many kinds of disinformation, he engages in about 20 different kinds of nasty propaganda techniques himself, especially in his public lectures... dismissive ness is one of the trickiest cards that he plays in his public lectures. He'll say things like, 'Oh well, we don't know who did 9/11, but it really doesn't matter,' and then he'll just go on!

And that is a point where in a just, in an intellectually honest world, someone would say, "Hold it right there, Noam. Just hold it right there. WHY does it not matter, who did 9/11?"

But of course when he's speaking before an adulatory crowd, they just accept this, he throws out these great dismissive phrases, and just continues on. And one of the tricks of his trade, is of course that he's written this immense number of books, he's incredibly prolific, I have 16 of his books myself, and in each of those books if you look toward the end, you'll find these massive numbers of footnotes, and he's renowned for tracking down these obscure facts from obscure journals and documents, and so people assume, when he's doing public speaking, that everything he says is equally well-researched, equally well-footnoted, equally valid... and it's not. He makes all sorts of just vague, sweeping generalizations, dismissive statements, complete mis-weighting of things, where something is very important he'll dismiss as unimportant and vice-versa.

He throws up a smokescreen by way of always talking, and I don't disagree with him on this... it's an effective one, in any of his talks he'll talk about Granada, he'll talk about El Salvador, he'll talk about East Timor... no question, he was blowing the whistle on those for a long time, he harks back to them, but you know what?
posted by Whisleblower
http://factsnotfairies.blogspot.com/

**************************************************

The Shame of Noam Chomsky & left gatekeepers

Author Barrie Zwicker's book, Towers of Deception: Noam Chomsky and the media cover-up of 9/1

Labels:

posted by Whisleblower

***************************************************

Noam Chomsky: Manufacturing Dissent

Chomsky's comments on the 9/11 Truth movement are full of surprising statements and bizarre non sequiturs. Find out more about the ways in which Chomsky is attempting to limit dissent by dismissing the concerns of a growing percentage of the population who no longer believe the official government-approved conspiracy theory about 9/11.
Part 1



Part 2
In the second part of this examination of Noam Chomsky's dissembling in regards to 9/11, we hear some of the voluminous evidence that all is not as it is portrayed in the media in regards to that attack. From terrorist financiers dining with intelligence committee chairman on the morning of the attack to CIA insider trading to Able Danger to military drills. We also hear Chomsky ask "Who cares?" if 9/11 were an inside job.

More at http://www.corbettreport.com
posted by Whisleblower

44 comments:

  1. Indeed, 911 is a litmus test of every individual. In this sense, there is a divine element to the event because it seems to separate the goats from the sheep (not using sheep in the pejorative sense). I think we can now say that people who deny 911 truth do not care about truth, are out for themselves, are spiritual failures, perhaps even enemies of God.

    Yes there are some who have not heard any of the facts, yet many reveal themselves when they deliberately avoid looking at them. 911 is a divine flashlight and so apt for our time that I cannot believe its coincidence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that Chomsky is a scientist and, therefore, he doesn't like to talk about anything he cannot prove. His statements uses to be supported by strong sources.

    I personally don't believe in the 911 oficial story. Actually, I believe that it was an inside job. However, Bush regime has done a good job of cover up and destroyed all the proofs. So, it's hard to prove anything.

    ReplyDelete
  3. dear F: It is only hard to prove to those who prefer to deny it. They expect the evidence to be laid out for them, as if to say "prove it to me". Those who are devoted to what is right have already searched out the evidence and trust me, there is no doubt whatsoever. But it is not only the Bush regime; Nearly the entire Federal government and media is guilty of either participation or covering up; which is just as bad. American citizens also have failed the test, in the majority. Therefore USA is going to collapse and deservedly so. It is starting now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice post, Kenny; I found it at ThePeoplesVoice.

    The picture of the razor wire fence is apt: Chomsky does seem to be a "gatekeeper" of sorts. For someone so keen to Israeli crimes against humanity, the obvious Mossad connections to 911 sure do escape him fast. And for someone revered as "the intellectual of our time," his views on gun control are quite naive, sophomoric, and verging on idiotic.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was directly involved, and not a single person in media would dare touch the content of my story, as the posts I have made DO lead directly to specific individuals, and to their off-shore banking connections. But, we can't 'hate' Israel, aka Noam Chomsky, et. all, just because they've long since fallen prey to sucking up to their Jewish masters.

    Were there actually such a thing as "radical Islamic terrorism," I assure you it would come by way of the fury of naturalized Americans, who could (and probably should) ignite every last inch of precious Southern california architecture. ..During the la Nina, and el Ninyo, everyone knows you could do this using less than a dozen boxes of kitchen matches. But, AMAZINGLY, somehow, MOST people uphold peaceful courteous human values.

    The ONLY question is, who will survive the coming "Zimbawbe-ification" of the USA?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Noam Chomsky is a gatekeeper. He is loathe to point the finger at any Israeli / Mossad involvement in recent (past 45 years or more) U.S. history. This is typical for someone with absolute blind total obedience to the state of Israel, to the extent that hell will freeze over before Mr. Chomsky would admit that Israel has been at the root of most of the evil going on where undeniable MOSSAD linkages to the events have been uncovered.

    much in the same way the MSM in the U.S. is the de-facto gatekeeper for the Right Wing NEOCONS, so Chomsky is for protecting Israel every step of the way thru his life.

    I'd not pay much attention to Chomsky, he's pretty much recognized throughout the world as a ZIONIST GATEKEEPER and as such, cannot be trusted to tell the truth, even small bits of truth, if it besmirches Israeli interests.

    time to let sleeping MOSSAD AGENTS like Chomsky, lay..

    ReplyDelete
  7. Chomsky is a Zionist first and foremost, and since Israel (Mossad) was involved with 9/11, he cannot question the offical story for fear it will begin to unravel.

    The other theory would be that he is being blackmailed by the Bush Administration. That is why I think so many members of Congress have not questioned the ludicrous story our Government devised about 9/11. Remember, the "domestic spy program" was underway BEFORE 9/11.

    A third theory is intimidation. Remember the anthrax attacks on Sens. Daschle & Leahy -- well, that was the last time you heard anyone speaking out against the Patriot Act.

    Think about it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Excellent article. This pathetic jew shill-I call him "chumpsky"- makes me laugh so hard my stomach hurts.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Unfortunately 911 is only a symptom of the disease. As long as we keep looking at or for symptoms, they will continue to feed them to us. 911 is only one of many crimes of the banking elite, as long as we watch their puppets(Bush, Clinton, Putin, Iran Pres, Chinese Pres, Arabs, Jews, politicians, religious leaders, MSM, etc) we will continue to lose the battle because we are fighting the wrong fight. There are only two types of people, the elite(Semite and non-Semite) and the masses(Semite and non-Semite). As long as the masses keep fighting each other the elite will continue to win and the masses will continue to die. We have to figure out how to bring down the disease, and the symptoms will come down with it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 911 was carried out by Freemasonry - that worldwide Synagogue of Satan which rules the world. but Chomsky claims, despite his prolific knowledge, to not know anything about Freemasonry - personally I don't buy it. He is a self confessed disinformation agent....no need to be polite.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Chomsky is clearly a 'dis-info' agent (as are some of these commenters). He's probably paid by Mossad and his Israel masters. He's "tough" on Israel on minor issues and glosses over 9/11 and Mossad. Only Israel benefits from these endless Middle East wars. Iraq is the beginning. As we commit war-crimes in Baghdad, the US gov't commits treason at home by opening mail, eliminating habeas corpus, using the judiciary to steal private lands, banning books like America Deceived (book) from Amazon and Wikipedia, conducting warrantless wiretaps and engaging in illegal wars on behalf of AIPAC's 'money-men'. Soon, another US false-flag operation will occur (sinking of an Aircraft Carrier by Mossad) and the US will invade Iran.. Then we'll invade Syria, then Saudi Arabia, then Lebanon (again) then ....

    ReplyDelete
  12. OK, let's say we ALL know exactly who organized, planned and executed 9/11. Let's say we are 100% certain, we know ALL the facts and everything. Let's say it's Mossad and everyone knows it. So what? What can we do, really do? Can we prosecute them? Can we "bring them to justice"? Can we? Obviously we won't be able to.
    Look at what we know: Bush, Cheiney, Rumsfeld, Wolfovitz, etc etc (the list can go on and on and on)
    lied to the public and to the Congress about Iraq. We ALL KNOW that now beyond a shadow of a doubt. So what? Can we prosecute them then? Can we I ask again? What good does the knowledge does then except to make you more upset and to show you how really powerless you/we are?
    Look at history. We know Reagan lied about Iran contra affair. Nothing happen to him. We know Bush Senior is a documented war criminal. Has anything happened to him? We know Bush Senior lied to get into Iran war 1. Has anything happened to him? Has it?? Well????
    So what if Chomsky doesn't care about Kennedy murders and Marten Luther King murders and 9-11. He is right, ultimetly these events don't really matter.
    They only serve to divert the attention from the real evens going on, evens right in front of our eyes. Events such as creating fake fiat money out of thin air by a semi private semi government organization.
    Chomsky's job is not to discuss who did 9/11 or who did Kennedy assassinations. His job as he sees it is to talk about what type of country USA really is and what capitalism really is and how it operates. It that he succeeds, brilliantly.
    Kennedy murders happened almost 50 years ago and you sill talk about them as if they really matter.
    They do, but not in the way you talk about them. What really matters is how one functions in "capitalist" society to make sure we are not taken for a ride and we are not taken by "their" vision of really they try to sell us every minute of the: "day buy buy buy".
    Who did 9/11 doesn't matter anymore. We passed that point LONG ago. What matters is to be able to construct your life so you can be as independent of "their" vision of Reality as possible. Are you still tied up to your credit card and mortgage payments? DO you still have cable TV? DO you still watch sports? Do you still relentlessly consume day in and day out? How free are you to set up your every day life? THats what's really important. We will NEVER know who did the Kennedy murders or 9/11. They dont matter really. Chomsky is right. You are wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  13. OK, let's say we ALL know exactly who organized, planned and executed 9/11. Let's say we are 100% certain, we know ALL the facts and everything. Let's say it's Mossad and everyone knows it. So what? What can we do, really do? Can we prosecute them? Can we "bring them to justice"? Can we? Obviously we won't be able to.
    Look at what we know: Bush, Cheiney, Rumsfeld, Wolfovitz, etc etc (the list can go on and on and on)
    lied to the public and to the Congress about Iraq. We ALL KNOW that now beyond a shadow of a doubt. So what? Can we prosecute them then? Can we I ask again? What good does the knowledge does then except to make you more upset and to show you how really powerless you/we are?
    Look at history. We know Reagan lied about Iran contra affair. Nothing happen to him. We know Bush Senior is a documented war criminal. Has anything happened to him? We know Bush Senior lied to get into Iran war 1. Has anything happened to him? Has it?? Well????
    So what if Chomsky doesn't care about Kennedy murders and Marten Luther King murders and 9-11. He is right, ultimetly these events don't really matter.
    They only serve to divert the attention from the real evens going on, evens right in front of our eyes. Events such as creating fake fiat money out of thin air by a semi private semi government organization.
    Chomsky's job is not to discuss who did 9/11 or who did Kennedy assassinations. His job as he sees it is to talk about what type of country USA really is and what capitalism really is and how it operates. It that he succeeds, brilliantly.
    Kennedy murders happened almost 50 years ago and you sill talk about them as if they really matter.
    They do, but not in the way you talk about them. What really matters is how one functions in "capitalist" society to make sure we are not taken for a ride and we are not taken by "their" vision of really they try to sell us every minute of the day: "buy buy buy".
    Who did 9/11 doesn't matter anymore. We passed that point LONG ago. What matters is to be able to construct your life so you can be as independent of "their" vision of Reality as possible. Are you still tied up to your credit card and mortgage payments? DO you still have cable TV? DO you still watch sports? Do you still relentlessly consume day in and day out? How free are you to set up your every day life? THats what's really important. We will NEVER know who did the Kennedy murders or 9/11. They dont matter really. Chomsky is right. You are wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Noam Chomsky, Amy Goodman, Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, Howard Stern... all "champions of the little people"

    Ventura Lectures Howard Stern on 9/11
    http://nationalexpositor.com/News/1241.html

    On Israel, Bill Maher Likes the President
    http://www.forward.com/articles/on-israel-maher-likes-the-president/

    Bill Maher: 9/11 Truthers need professional help, not publicity
    http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Bill_Maher_Thinks_911_Truthers_should_0915.html

    Protocol No. 12
    We Control the Press
    I BEG YOU TO NOTE THAT AMONG THOSE MAKING ATTACKS UPON US WILL ALSO BE ORGANS ESTABLISHED BY US, BUT THEY WILL ATTACK EXCLUSIVELY POINTS THAT WE HAVE PRE-DETERMINED TO ALTER...

    Methods of organization like these, imperceptible to the public eye but absolutely sure, are the best calculated to succeed in bringing the attention and the confidence of the public to the side of our government. Thanks to such methods we shall be in a position as from time to time may be required, to excite or to tranquillize the public mind on political questions, to persuade or to confuse, printing now truth, now lies, facts or their contradictions, according as they may be well or ill received, always very cautiously feeling our ground before stepping upon it .... WE SHALL HAVE A SURE TRIUMPH OVER OUR OPPONENTS SINCE THEY WILL NOT HAVE AT THEIR DISPOSITION ORGANS OF THE PRESS IN WHICH THEY CAN GIVE FULL AND FINAL EXPRESSION TO THEIR VIEWS owing to the aforesaid methods of dealing with the press. We shall not even need to refute them except very superficially.

    16. Trial shots like these, fired by us in the third rank of our press, in case of need, will be energetically refuted by us in our semi-official organs....


    Luckily, its just an anti-Semitic myth...

    ReplyDelete
  15. Someone here said chomsky is a "Zionist first and foremost"... Yes, he does claim to be this, you can find quotes of him saying this. You can also find that when he claims this he states what he actually believes, and if you had listened you'd know that the type of zionism he believes in is actually the complete opposite of what modern zionists believe in today. He doesn't believe there should be an exclusive jewish state, and never has. He said it would be "discriminatory and racist" You can find it quite easily on www.chomsky.info.. So to whoever said that, I would suggest doing you're homework...

    I can't believe this blog article was even written. Chomsky has done more for the truth movement as a whole than any one of you could ever dream of achieving. It's almost like there's so much desperation to point the finger at someone, that you're now pointing the finger at yourselves - it's so counterproductive that it leaves me to believe that many "truth seekers" are loosing their way, and aren't able to see the bigger picture. When "truth seekers" start attacking the man that has done more for the truth movement and human rights as a whole then the entire 9/11 truth movement, then it is truly a sad day. I believe it's fair to say that Chomsky is more devoted to truth and the welfare of humanity than most could ever be.

    I, for one, do believe that there is something very fishy about 9/11... I can't say it's exactly an israeli scheme, i cant say its bush, i cant say because I don't know... And I'm not willing to say I believe it's this or that when I don't have any solid evidence.

    It's actually better that Chomsky stays out of the 9/11 conspiracy. The topics he covers are a lot more crucial and important then the 9/11 conspiracy. He covers the Palestinian situation regularly. He talks about hezbollah, hamas , the problems in south africa, he talks a lot about south america, and it's always very critical of the US. He talks about the huge gulf between American policy and public opinion - in the realm of healthcare, social programs, the war in iraq. He does it with masterful use of FACTS as well.

    The "dismissiveness" the blogger is talking about, it would make sense to at least give some specific examples. The quote that was offered was not a real quote. No specific examples are offered - if you were serious you'd at least do that. I think that what you see as "dismissive" is Chomsky's attempt at guiding you to the bigger picture. Which is something he's very good at - he always put things into an understandable context. I believe he also understands that there is no sense in him talking about such a touchy subject as the 9/11 conspiracy when on the surface you can just see the amount of holes in the story.

    Chomsky, with his books, talks, interviews & articles, will continue to serve our interests, and the interests of humanity for many many years to come.

    To the writer of the blog: I think you need a little perspective.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks to Whisleblower at factsnotfairies.blogspot.com for the articles. They seen to have touched a nerve in a lot of people and for good reason. Chomsky is the premier example of a zionist "gatekeeper" and a non-entity in what many of us call the truth movement.
    9/11 does matter. It is the "mother" of all the crimes and lies for this century.
    I say we never rest until the truth is fully exposed and the criminals responsible brought to justice.

    ReplyDelete
  17. #######
    #######

    Chomsky has to be an agent for those
    evil magicians, as there are far
    too many anomalies surrounding 9/11
    not to be TOTALLY PERSUADED that
    government generated explanations
    are dissembling means to a cover-up:

    #######
    #######

    ReplyDelete
  18. .......something very fishy about 9/11...... now THAT"S the understatement of the century. Every single aspect of 9/11 and the "Official Story" is absolutely putrid foul rotten garbage. I think the only crazier than the "Story" is the fact that otherwise intelligent people still buy it......but then again, what else is new.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Disinformation is a ramped up part of the "wag the dog scenario".
    Main stream media actually thinks we will believe any thing they tell us.
    I am guessing MSM is disappointed that our conscious dose not let the majority of us believe tailored propaganda.Any one can make a video of any one doing any thing,Thus this is not substantial evidents.Any one can write a story telling us any thing but this dose not make it truth nor real.When anyone lies to me and I catch them in this lie,It is unlikely I will believe any thing else they have to say.Once the truth becomes compromised,The deception becomes flawed.Truth like water will always seek its own level no matter whose up to their neck in lies.Eventually the truth will surface and it dose matter.If truth in history did not matter then no one would keep records about any thing.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Pretty easy to dismiss any of your ideas when you link to racist, homophobic hate blogs like "News from the West."

    ReplyDelete
  21. petkov: "We are past 911?" Oh really? So if I raped your wife or killed your kids, then 5 yrs from now or so you will be willing to let it pass? remind me to borrow money from you.

    You say: What can we do? You were perhaps waiting for a committee to vote on it? The idea is to get enough people on board so that they will know who to go after when the fighting starts. And it will, because though you think it's over, 911 was a step in a plan that ends with the death of 4 billion people. That is th relevance here.

    The American revolution was only fought by 3%. THREE PERCENT!. They used "underhanded" tactics for the day. (hiding behind trees, etc) We will find a modern equivalent.

    Congress takes 911 truth more seriously than you do. That is why they are considering domestic anti-terror laws that seek to shut down conspiracy bloggers, etc.. They know there is a risk to their life. They will not be in office forever. Cannot have protection their entire remaining life.

    Anyway, you are looking at truth from a nonchalant, aloof viewpoint. I am sure you would not do so if you lost loved ones in the attacks.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It seems to me that Chomsky is just old and could really care less on all matters of concern. He seems to be "going through the motions". Just an old man. What does it matter what he say's now?

    ReplyDelete
  23. It never fails to impress me that the moment one speaks out on the the truth no matter what it is ,The one who tries to cover it up will almost always stoop to respond with ugly words, intimidation,death threats,even your mental health is questioned.It is as though a serious defensive mechanism kicks in, as if the lier him self can not contain his own obvious guilt.When a lier gets ugly It is because you are making to much progress in uncovering the truth.His actions speak louder than words .Watch for this phenomenon in your research on 911or any other cooperate discussions about any product or info cover ups from cell phones to ufo.s.Intimidation is a tool used to silence but it is also a good indicator that you are dangerously close to the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I've always been suspicious of Chomsky's academic obscurantism. It always made people feel special when they could understand what he was talking about. I really smelled a rat when he dismissed 911, which was like throwing away the murder weapon at a crime scene. At best he is trying to prevent a surge of anti-semitism, which is likely to occur when ordinary Americans figure the Neocon crooks (and so many other Zionists out). At worse, he is just another Mossad fraud waging war through deception. I don't waste my time trying to figure out great men anymore. We are all crooks, suckers, and lazy cowards.

    ReplyDelete
  25. hismailroom...dot...com...

    prophecies...dot...org...

    Read the truth of Revelation 12
    and understand what they are really up to.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Just for the record, here are some documented 9/11 facts.

    1) There is absolutely no video showing any of these people boarding any of the flights.

    2) There has not been one corpse of any of the alleged passengers, any of their luggage, or any debris proven to have come from either a 757 or a 767, much less any of the alleged specific flights, recovered from any of the crash sites. There have been no remains returned to any alleged relatives, and there have been no funeral arrangements for any of them.

    3) A woman named Ellen Mariani spent five years searching for relatives of 64 people on "Flight 175's" passenger list. She never found anybody.

    4) Official government documentation on the web sites of both the BTS and the FAA verified that the two AA flights were not even scheduled to fly on 9/11, and the two UA flights were listed as "valid," meaning in service, until September 28, 2005. The BTS altered its own web pages in late 2004 after a 9/11 researcher pointed out the criminal implications, and the FAA only deregistered the two UA flights after two other 9/11 researchers made repeated inquiries into why the two planes were still listed as active.

    5) Neither one of those two airlines has ever filed a loss claim with their insurance carriers over those four specific flights. EVER. This is positive proof that the airlines are completely involved in the ongoing government cover-up.

    6) On 9/11, according to the FAA registry of pilots, not one of the eight alleged pilots had a current, valid commercial pilot's license.

    So, no commercial airliners were involved in the attacks. Regardless of whether they actually used planes or, as I strongly suspect, photo-shopped planes over video taken of explosions inside the WTC buildings due to pre-planted explosives such as thermite and/or thermate, none of the alleged passengers were on any of the alleged flights. In fact, there are a ton of reasons why they would not have used planes at all; there are way too many things that could go wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I too have often questioned Chomsky. For me the jury's still out on what makes these fools tick. Obviously he is an intellegent man. I can easily beleive that he is "doing his job" by instruction of his Jewish masters. But, on the other hand, he may be a victim of the sort of "ego-mania" that makes him so certain of his expertise that logic is unnecessary.
    Look at that clown Dershowitz! He's supposedly a great "legal mind". Look how irrational he is when it comes to Zionism. All logic just flies right out the window.
    Chomsky's "detachment" is unnerving. He often comes close to identifying problems but never goes to the source of those problems. That's because HE is his own "guiding light". It's all just a "curiousity" to him. It's typical Jewish "values". In other words, no "good" or "evil", just curious happenstance.
    Whether he's paid or does it "pro bono" the fact remains that he's a useful idiot. The so-called Lefties use him as a guide to "acceptable discussion" and the "Wingers" use him as a symbol of evil intellectualism. Either way he helps them keep everyone in darkness.

    ReplyDelete
  28. J said: "I think we can now say that people who deny 911 truth do not care about truth, are out for themselves, are spiritual failures, perhaps even enemies of God."

    One can be an enemy of the God thoery and yet know beyond doubt (after careful research), that 9-11 was not only an inside job but that the 9-11 Commission Report was nothing but a massive attempt to cover up the fact that it was an inside job.

    Building #7 had no major structural damage yet it fell into its own footprint at almost free-fall speed. Buildings #1 and #2 also fell at near free-fall speed into their own footprint with squibs going off on the floors well beneath where the higher floors were "pancaking.

    The Pentagon "plane" could not have made such a small hole in the wall.

    The plane in Penn. left no wreckage larger than a kitchen sink.

    And, finally, no government, even our enept government, could have been so remiss in so many ways on that fateful day on 9-11.

    No, J, one can certainly be an enemy of the God theory yet know that 9-11 was nothing BUT an inside job. --jws

    PS -- There are those who might say, "If there were a God, 9-11 (and millions of other atrocities) would never have happened, killing innocent men, women and children".

    ReplyDelete
  29. Yes, in a way 911 is a litmus test... A genetic test too? There is the 10% of the people that DON"T blindly follow their LEADER..... We here are them... When the Monica Lewinski scandal hit, conservative talk Rush Limbaw's mantra was "We just want the truth" HE is however not at all "CURIOUS" to find the entire truth of 911....It is always difficult to show the 90% followers that they have been "betrayed" I.E. lied to. They will disregard the most compelling evidence.....to avoid the awful TRUTH....that they have been HAD....."Don't say that" is the phrase I encounter most often when taking on the "official legend" for 911. Do NOT utter those words that make OUR system, OUR beliefs, OUR lives A TOTAL LIE!! Don't do it!! "You DON'T think the president knew, do you?? I've got no idea if he knew....... LOOK at the Booker School video and decide for yourself................

    ReplyDelete
  30. I wonder if Noam Chomsky believes in freedom of speech for Larry Sinclair? Larry's "story" has not made it to the main stream media as yet, as it would shake up too many "beliefs" in the unreal world of politics.

    Noam Chomsky could be the one to make Larry Sinclair's story go mainstream.

    --jws

    ReplyDelete
  31. Please stop with the "no planes" theory... that evidence more reasonably points to the fact that dummy planes (identicals or mock-ups) were used, rather than no planes at all.

    Obviously two massive aircraft DID hit the WTC buildings. It's indisputable. Were those the commercial airliners full of passengers that we're lead to believe... perhaps not...

    WTC 7 is the smoking gun. Focusing on anything else is a waste of time.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Chomsky is a jew shill, plain and simple. 911 was a jew job. Mossad blew the buildings just like they attacked the USS Liberty to get us into war. Jews killed JFK and jew Zapruder "filmed" it. Jews blew the OKC federal building and blamed militias. Jews were behind the Bolshevik revolution, Lavon affair, Armenian holocaust, both world wars, etc. Or should I say all 3 world wars? There are more jews on this comment board than you can shake a stick at covering for their buddy Chumpsky the jew, and there seem to be numbers of them with the "bush covered it TOO GOOD, we'll NEVER KNOW" act. I know...so will many others. Parasitic genocidal jews are the problem. Very simple. Don't waste your time listening to this critter chumpsky producing co2 with his worthless mouth.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Addressin anonymous on no planes:

    There is TONS of evidence the planes didn't exist, and THIS is a KEY piece of the evidence. The jew media faked the planes for the jew mossad and jew silverstein so the jews who run our govt could pull off 911 and blame it on hijackers, many of which are inconveniently still alive. There were ABSOLUTELY NO PLANES on 911. It was a WAG THE DOG scenario. A movie production. Jew media, jew hollywood, jew mossad, and jew parasites running our govt. This evidence more clearly points out the jews because who else owns the media? Oh, see, it's the jews.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Since I'm the one who first posted the "no plane" comment, for anybody that's convinced that planes hit the towers, there are two things to consider. First, remember that every single video you've seen of the impacts came from people who are directly connected to the media, and there are time delays associated with television.

    Second, watch all of the WTC 2 impact videos you can find, from all angles, and especially slowed down. The plane enters the building completely intact, as if it were a ghost, with no resistance on the part of the building, with not one part of the plane blasting off and falling to the street below, and there is no explosion until the plane is completely inside the building. This is flat-out ridiculous. The laws of physics cannot be suspended, overturned, delayed, or eliminated. No real plane could possibly do what that plane does in that video.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Confucius say "why does Israeli Tail wag American Dog? Hah? Chomsky tries to "confuse us"
    Adios

    ReplyDelete
  36. Who care about the "911 litmus test" in the real world of politics and science?

    Isn't that the problem?

    You'll not get any where except a lot of left-wingers angry at your incessant slamming of Chomsky. Anyone who reads Chomsky knows he is quite right about a lot of things. Only because he doesn't give too much to 911 conspiracy theory is no reason to slamming him. Your losing a lot of votes when you do.

    ReplyDelete
  37. 911 put the criminal cabal in hyperspeed rushing to slay and dismantle the last of our meager rights. To think it doesnt matter who did it - is unbelievable.

    The cause of our downfall is a total stage show set up and put on by the ones who benefit and who control the media - the courts - etc.

    Its one thing in a long line of atrocities that this group has perpetrated against the world and country and it will and is being their downfall.

    To ignore it is to accept it.

    As for Noam - he's said some brilliant things in his career - his 911 comments are not among them.

    Let's face it, he's either bought off, threatened or approaching demetia.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think this whole blog is a sign, one - fortunately - among many these days, that makes it clear that the their days are numbered. Oh, they'll be in power still, how much longer exactly I don't know, but it's all unraveling.
    Oh What a Tangled Web They've Weaved!
    And now they are as stuck in it as the rest of us.

    Oh, and also, as someone whose done a lot of traveling around Latin America I can tell you that the smarter ones down there are on to the whole "Bush Regime" nonsense. They know he's a puppet and they know Chavez is too. That whole farce at the UN when he flashed a copy of Chomsky's book.
    Chaves has lots and lots of money. If he wanted to really disgrace the USA and Bush he could contract an entire Research Team, protect their anonymity, and release the results for the world to see, including other competent professionals to verify the findings.
    Even if the project cost a few million it's still nothing for him. He could afford it. But no, he doesn't do s---. CONCLUSION: He's a Clown, a Controlled Clown.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Dr. Chomsky is a genius, and a great man. Those who slam him, are suspect, IMO.
    Dr. Chomsky stuck up for the victims of Jenin. He wrote a foreword in the book about Jenin.
    As for 9/11?
    Mossad and Dick Cheney and friends.
    No doubt, IMO.
    That deal was the one big thing that will cause these criminals to face the dock.
    But, all you all, who think that you can slam the man?
    You are not worthy to wash his feet.
    Go write 98 books on human rights, found an entire area of study, like he did, and then get back to me about your nasty mouthed comments regarding Dr. Noam Chomsky.

    ReplyDelete
  40. To those advocating the "no plane" theory: Why would they take the risk of not using planes (or at least plane lookalikes), causing suspicion with anyone witnessing the event? You can't photoshop planes into the eyewitnesses' brains (yet).

    And to the "it's the jews" people: It's not quite that easy. Yes, many of the people involved are jewish (Larry Silverstein, Dov Zakheim, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Bill Kristol, involved Mossad agents, assorted media coverup managers, .....). Others are not (George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleeza Rice, .....), and there are plenty of jews who have nothing at all to do with what is going on.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Ever see the picture of "shrub" with the talmud (book of evil) under his arm on the way to "skool"?
    Who's not a joo?
    Bunches hiding in plain sight is the next missing link.

    http://judicial-inc.biz/
    has a lot of info. regarding Churchill, Roosevelt, Elvis, Eisenhower, and more, later "outed" as joo.

    ReplyDelete
  42. ... 911 hoax is only the first lithmus test. Whether the "truther" exposes the Vatican's Jesuits as controllers of the CIA is the more important test. Good way to flunk the test: blame others and divert attention from the Jesuits.

    EXPEL THE JESUITS!

    ReplyDelete
  43. > EXPEL THE JESUITS!

    Damn, another jew

    ReplyDelete
  44. So, in your mind, anyone who agrees with you about the events of 911 passes this litmus test. Anyone who disagrees fails. I suppose the overwhelming evidence that 911 truthers have engaged in rampant dishonesty, poor logic, and overwhelming ignorance is not relevant. The "truth" is what it is because you say so, and anyone who's smarter than you or just sees it different has failed your artificial litmus test.

    How wonderful for you.

    ReplyDelete